← Back to list
🎨
advocacy-program-designer ✓ Security reviewed
Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or…
🎨 Design & Creative By aaron-he-zhu Version v1.0.0 Updated 2026-09-03
7.3Overall rating

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "advocacy-program-designer" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/advocacy-program-designer.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/advocacy-program-designer.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 5 KB

About this skill

Overview

Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or "build a share kit for the team"; produces an advocacy program blueprint in two modes — participation-driven opt-in (default) or top-down assigned with its coercion and authenticity risks flagged — with a voluntary opt-in roster spec submitted as channel-registry proposal events, share kits with mandatory per-person variation, staggered human posting windows plus anti-pod guardrails (no coordinated identical reshares, no engagement rings), per-person material-connection disclosure lines per FTC and 《互联网广告管理办法》, and a Slack/Teams distribution spec. Not for paid creator campaigns — use campaign-planner. 员工倡导/创始人IP分享/内部分享计划/披露合规

Source

  • Repo: https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
  • Path: social/craft/advocacy-program-designer

Evaluation

AI-evaluated 2026-09-03: Extremely detailed 8-step blueprint with per-person variation, disclosure requirements per FTC and Chinese regs, receipts, and anti-pod guardrails. However it is deeply coupled to the authors own registry/ECHO framework, so standalone usability drops, and the niche use case limits broad appeal.

Score breakdown

Quality
8.0
Usability
6.0
Security
8.0
Popularity
7.0