← Back to list
📣

contract-helper Checked

Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "bui…
📣 Marketing skills By aaron-he-zhu Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-03 Updated 2026-09-03 Source ↗
8.6Overall rating
2Views
5Downloads
2.7kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "contract-helper" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/contract-helper.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/contract-helper.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 12 KB
📊 Static rating
8.6/10
Trigger
9.5
Structure
7.3
Workflow
9.2
Content
9.0
Engineering
4.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查

Contract Helper

Create and review influencer partnership agreements. Clear contracts protect both brand and creator and set expectations for the collaboration.

⚠️ This skill provides general guidance and templates. Always have contracts reviewed by legal counsel before execution.

Documentation

Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查

Contract Helper

Create and review influencer partnership agreements. Clear contracts protect both brand and creator and set expectations for the collaboration.

⚠️ This skill provides general guidance and templates. Always have contracts reviewed by legal counsel before execution.

Quick Start


Draft an influencer agreement for [deliverables] with [compensation terms]

Review these contract terms from an influencer agency: [paste terms]

Skill Contract

  • **Reads**: campaign brief, agreed deliverables, compensation figure, platform list, usage-rights and exclusivity needs, any pasted incoming agreement, and stable party_ref, contact_ref, address_ref, and signature_ref values when available. Raw legal names, entity identifiers, emails, phones, postal addresses, payment details, and signatures are transient execution inputs only. If memory-management is active, prior outreach terms and budget caps load from the hot cache. For a rostered creator, resolve the carried opaque creator_ref through its authorized artifact or verified registry link, then read memory/creators/<aggregate-id>.md — the creator-registry (../../../protocol/creator-registry/SKILL.md) projection — for existing exclusivity windows, contract status, usage-rights history, and standard-range anchors before drafting or reviewing. Never derive the path from a raw handle.
  • **Writes**: return the drafted agreement or review memo inline by default. With exact WARM-save authorization, memory/influencer/contract-helper/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md stores only party_ref, contact_ref, address_ref, signature_ref, and a non-PII terms summary; it never stores raw party/contact/address/signature values, payment details, or the executable/signed document bytes. The e-sign execution copy remains in the authorized external document/e-sign system. Each signed-term update requires a separate exact authorization for an operation: propose request through registry-events.py to memory/events/creators.ndjson; only creator-registry writes canonical roster records.
  • **Promotes**: only with separate exact authorization, promote durable signed terms (usage-rights window, exclusivity scope, payment schedule) to memory/hot-cache.md.
  • **Done when**:
  • Every required term is filled or explicitly marked TBD (parties, deliverables, compensation, payment timeline, usage rights, exclusivity, termination).
  • Red flags are listed for any review, and a legal-counsel review note is attached before execution.
  • A negotiation cheat sheet maps each open term only to a user-
View full documentation

supplied target or a source-dated, jurisdiction/market-compatible anchor; otherwise the counter remains TBD/NEEDS_INPUT.

  • Any WARM record is reference-only, and any signature request is either not sent or has its own exact authorization bound to the final recipient, document bytes, and channel.
  • **Primary next skill**: brief-generator (../../target/brief-generator/SKILL.md) — after signature, create or finalize the creator-ready brief, then let the creator fulfill it. A signature alone is never enough to route to amplification.

### Handoff Summary

> Emit the standard shape from skill-contract.md §Handoff Summary Format (../../../references/skill-contract.md).

Data Sources

This family needs no live integrations (Tier 1). The skill works by asking you for the inputs directly: parties, deliverables, compensation, platform, and any incoming terms to review. Paste an agency's draft and it reviews against the checklist with zero setup.

Optional connectors that COULD speed up specific steps:

  • ~~CRM / deal record — pull agreed scope and rate so you don't re-type them.
  • ~~influencer database — resolve legal-name/entity inputs transiently from authorized party refs for the external execution copy; retain only opaque refs in WARM.
  • ~~e-signature — hold the full execution copy outside WARM and route it only after the independent signature-send authorization below.

See CONNECTORS.md (../../../CONNECTORS.md) for the free/keyless recipe per category. None are required.

Instructions

When a user requests contract help:

1. **Gather contract parameters** — capture party_ref, contact_ref, address_ref, and signature_ref plus partnership details (campaign, duration, deliverables, compensation) and additional terms (usage rights, exclusivity, approval, platforms). Raw identity/contact/address/signature inputs stay transient. Use the gathering form in references/templates.md §1 (references/templates.md).

2. **Draft the agreement** — fill the 11-section framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, approval, compliance/FTC, warranties, confidentiality, indemnification, termination, miscellaneous + signatures). The reference-safe WARM summary and the external-only execution-copy template are separated in references/templates.md §2 (references/templates.md). Scale sections to deal size — drop whitelisting/broad-exclusivity blocks for small deals.

3. **Explain key clauses** — for each material clause give what it covers, why it matters, and what to watch for. Clause guide in references/templates.md §3 (references/templates.md).

4. **Review and flag** — for any incoming paper, run the checklist: essential terms present, red flags, and per-clause counters. Never use a built-in duration, revision count, turnaround time, or payment term as a default. A numerical counter must be user-supplied or tied to a source-dated, jurisdiction/market-compatible anchor; otherwise mark it TBD/NEEDS_INPUT. Checklist + tables in references/templates.md §4-5 (references/templates.md).

5. **Prepare and authorize e-sign execution** — keep the full executable agreement in the external e-sign/document system, compute the SHA-256 over the exact final document bytes, and show the exact recipient_ref, document hash, and delivery channel. Sending for signature is an external mutation and requires an independent exact authorization bound to that tuple; drafting, legal review, WARM save, HOT promotion, or a prior send approval does not cover it. Resolve the raw recipient/contact/address only inside the authorized provider call. If any document byte, recipient, or channel changes, discard the approval and request a new one. Do not upload, route, or send when the tuple or authorization is missing.

6. **Route after signature** — if no final creator-ready brief exists, hand off to brief-generator (../../target/brief-generator/SKILL.md). If the brief already exists, proceed with creator fulfillment; when a submission arrives, hand its frozen version to creator-content-auditor (../creator-content-auditor/SKILL.md) for revision/approval. Route an auditor-approved frozen asset to content-amplifier (../content-amplifier/SKILL.md) only when active rights cover the intended use; Spark/boost paths additionally require the matching live post, while a dark-post path does not. Do not skip fulfillment or the content gate merely because the agreement is signed.

Return the drafted agreement or review memo inline. Offer a reference-only terms summary at the exact WARM save path; never place the e-sign execution copy there. Ask separately before any HOT promotion. Once terms are signed, offer another exact authorization for a one-line operation: propose update (usage-rights window, exclusivity scope, final rate) through registry-events.py to memory/events/creators.ndjson for creator-registry (../../../protocol/creator-registry/SKILL.md) to reconcile. Drafting, signing, saving, and signature delivery are four distinct authorization surfaces; none authorizes another.

If an authorized lightweight campaign tracker already exists, offer to record stage: contracted with the signed agreement in evidence_refs; that WARM update needs its own exact save authorization and is not canonical. If the brief is already final, do not invoke another planning skill merely to extend the chain: hand the contracted brief t

Score breakdown

Trigger
9.5
Clear What/When/When-Not with quoted trigger phrases, bilingual summary and explicit outreach-manager exclusion.
Structure
7.3
104-line SKILL.md with one local templates reference properly sectioned; offloads remaining detail to absent suite files.
Workflow
9.2
Six drafting/review steps with TBD/NEEDS_INPUT no-default rule, red-flag checklist, four-distinct-authorization surfaces and done-when criteria.
Content
9.0
Actionable and concrete with a worked example; suite jargon and memory-tier vocabulary add density.
Engineering
4.0
Frontmatter valid and templates.md exists, but sibling skills, skill-contract and registry-events.py references do not resolve.
Security
10.0
No scripts bundled; transient-PII handling, hash-bound signature authorization and legal-counsel disclaimer are security-positive.
Suite component with strong triggers, an 11-section drafting framework, no-default-numbers review rule and a hash-bound e-sign authorization design; most sibling links and the registry-events script are missing from the standalone zip.