← Back to list
💰

dex-pool-analysis Checked

AMM pool mechanics comparison across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora including fee structures, pool ty…
💰 Finance & Trading skills By agiprolabs Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-20 Updated 2026-09-20 Source ↗ Part of Finance & Trading →
8.8Overall rating
3Views
12Downloads
366Stars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "dex-pool-analysis" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/dex-pool-analysis.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/dex-pool-analysis.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 25 KB
📊 Static rating
8.8/10
Trigger
7.0
Structure
9.3
Workflow
8.4
Content
9.0
Engineering
10.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

AMM pool mechanics comparison across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora including fee structures, pool types, creation patterns, and volume efficiency

DEX Pool Analysis — Solana AMM Pool Mechanics & Comparison

Solana's DEX ecosystem spans multiple AMM designs: constant-product pools (Raydium V4), concentrated liquidity (Raydium CLMM, Orca Whirlpool), and bin-based liquidity (Meteora DLMM). Each pool type has distinct fee structures, capital efficiency characteristics, and risk profiles. Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the best execution venue, evaluating liquidity quality, and identifying pool-level risks.

This skill covers:

  • Pool type mechanics and fee structures across Solana DEXes
  • Pool health metrics (TVL, volume efficiency, fee APR, LP count)
  • Pool creation patterns (PumpFun graduation, manual creation)
  • Best pool selection for trade execution
  • Pool age and risk assessment

**Related skills**: See lp-math for AMM formulas, liquidity-analysis for depth assessment, impermanent-loss for LP risk, slippage-modeling for execution cost.

---

Documentation

AMM pool mechanics comparison across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora including fee structures, pool types, creation patterns, and volume efficiency

DEX Pool Analysis — Solana AMM Pool Mechanics & Comparison

Solana's DEX ecosystem spans multiple AMM designs: constant-product pools (Raydium V4), concentrated liquidity (Raydium CLMM, Orca Whirlpool), and bin-based liquidity (Meteora DLMM). Each pool type has distinct fee structures, capital efficiency characteristics, and risk profiles. Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the best execution venue, evaluating liquidity quality, and identifying pool-level risks.

This skill covers:

  • Pool type mechanics and fee structures across Solana DEXes
  • Pool health metrics (TVL, volume efficiency, fee APR, LP count)
  • Pool creation patterns (PumpFun graduation, manual creation)
  • Best pool selection for trade execution
  • Pool age and risk assessment

**Related skills**: See lp-math for AMM formulas, liquidity-analysis for depth assessment, impermanent-loss for LP risk, slippage-modeling for execution cost.

---

1. Pool Types on Solana

### Raydium V4 (Constant Product)

The most common pool type for newly launched tokens. Uses the classic xy = k invariant with a fixed 0.25% swap fee. Integrated with OpenBook (formerly Serum) for combined AMM + orderbook liquidity.


Program ID: 675kPX9MHTjS2zt1qfr1NYHuzeLXfQM9H24wFSUt1Mp8
Fee: 0.25% per swap (0.22% to LPs, 0.03% to RAY buyback)

**Key characteristics**:

  • Full-range liquidity (infinite price range)
  • Simple LP provisioning — deposit both tokens in equal value
  • Lower capital efficiency than concentrated liquidity
  • OpenBook market ID required for pool creation

### Raydium CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity)

Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker pools allow LPs to specify price ranges, improving capital efficiency by 10-100x compared to V4.


Program ID: CAMMCzo5YL8w4VFF8KVHrK22GGUsp5VTaW7grrKgrWqK
Fee tiers: 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, 1%, 2%
Tick spacing: 1, 10, 60, 120, 240 (corresponding to fee tiers)

**Key characteristics**:

  • LPs choose min/max price for their position
  • Positions represented as NFTs
  • Higher fee income per dollar deposited (when in range)
  • Risk of position going out of range (no fees earned)
  • Multiple fee tiers for different volatility profiles

### Orca Whirlpool (Concentrated Liquidity)

Orca's concentrated liquidity implementation, dominant for major token pairs (SOL/USDC, SOL/USDT).


Program ID: whirLbMiicVdio4qvUfM5KAg6Ct8VwpYzGff3uctyCc
Fee tiers: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.16%, 0.30%, 0.65%, 1%, 2%
Tick spacing: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 64, 128, 256, 512 (varies by fee)

**Key characteristics**:

  • Positions as NFTs (similar to Uniswap V3)
  • Wide fee tier selection for granular control
  • Strong SDK and developer tooling
  • Dominant for blue-chip Solana pairs

### Meteora DLMM (Dynamic Liquidity Market Maker)

View full documentation

Bin-based liquidity where each bin holds a fixed price. LPs distribute liquidity across bins using strategy modes.


Program ID: LBUZKhRxPF3XUpBCjp4YzTKgLccjZhTSDM9YuVaPwxo
Fee: Dynamic (base fee + variable fee based on volatility)
Bin step: 1-100 basis points per bin

**Key characteristics**:

  • Discrete price bins instead of continuous ticks
  • Dynamic fees that increase during high volatility
  • Strategy modes: Spot, Curve, Bid-Ask
  • Zero slippage within a single bin
  • Extremely capital efficient for stablecoin pairs

### Meteora Dynamic Pools

Multi-token pools with single-sided deposit capability and volatility-adjusted fees.


Program ID: Eo7WjKq67rjJQSZxS6z3YkapzY3eMj6Xy8X5EQVn5UaB
Fee: Volatility-based dynamic fee

**Key characteristics**:

  • Single-sided deposits allowed
  • Dynamic fee based on recent price volatility
  • Multi-token pool support
  • Simpler LP experience than concentrated liquidity

### PumpSwap (PumpFun AMM)

PumpFun's native AMM for tokens that graduate from the bonding curve.


Program ID: PSwapMdSai8tjrEXcxFeQth87xC4rRsa4VA5mhGhXkP
Fee: 0.25% per swap (0.20% to LPs, 0.05% protocol)
Migration fee: 0 SOL (post-March 2025)

**Key characteristics**:

  • Constant-product (xy = k) mechanics
  • Automatic migration from PumpFun bonding curve at ~$69K market cap
  • Creator coin rewards (10% of protocol fees to coin creators)

---

2. Fee Structure Comparison

| DEX | Pool Type | Fee Range | LP Share | Protocol Share |

|-----|-----------|-----------|----------|----------------|

| Raydium V4 | Constant Product | 0.25% fixed | 0.22% | 0.03% (RAY) |

| Raydium CLMM | Concentrated | 0.01%–2% | ~84% | ~16% |

| Orca Whirlpool | Concentrated | 0.01%–2% | 87% | 13% |

| Meteora DLMM | Bin-based | Dynamic | 80% | 20% |

| Meteora Dynamic | Dynamic | Variable | ~80% | ~20% |

| PumpSwap | Constant Product | 0.25% fixed | 0.20% | 0.05% |

**Fee tier selection guidance**:

  • **0.01%**: Stablecoin pairs (USDC/USDT) — minimal price movement
  • **0.05%**: Correlated assets (mSOL/SOL, jitoSOL/SOL) — low volatility
  • **0.25%–0.30%**: Standard pairs (SOL/USDC) — moderate volatility
  • **1%–2%**: Volatile/meme tokens — high impermanent loss risk

---

3. Pool Creation Patterns

### PumpFun Graduation Flow

Most new Solana meme tokens follow this lifecycle:


PumpFun Bonding Curve → ~$69K market cap → Migration → Raydium V4 or PumpSwap

1. Token launches on PumpFun bonding curve

2. As buys push market cap to ~$69K, the bonding curve completes

3. Liquidity migrates automatically to either Raydium V4 or PumpSwap

4. Since March 2025, PumpFun defaults migration to PumpSwap (their own AMM)

5. Post-migration, additional pools may be created on other DEXes

**Analysis implications**:

  • Pools created via PumpFun graduation have known initial liquidity (~$12K)
  • Very new graduated pools carry higher rug risk
  • Check if creator LP tokens are locked or burnable

### Manual Pool Creation

Tokens not launched via PumpFun have pools created manually:

  • Raydium V4 requires an OpenBook market + pool initialization
  • Raydium CLMM, Orca, and Meteora allow direct pool creation
  • Manual creation allows arbitrary initial liquidity amounts

---

4. Volume Efficiency (Volume/TVL Ratio)

Volume efficiency measures how actively a pool's liquidity is utilized:


volume_efficiency = volume_24h / tvl

| V/TVL Ratio | Interpretation |

|-------------|---------------|

| > 5.0 | Very high turnover — likely wash trading or bot activity |

| 1.0–5.0 | Active trading — healthy, well-utilized pool |

| 0.1–1.0 | Moderate activity — normal for mid-cap tokens |

| < 0.1 | Low activity — stale or abandoned pool |

| 0.0 | No trades — dead pool |

**Fee APR estimation from volume efficiency**:


fee_apr = volume_efficiency * fee_rate * 365
# Example: V/TVL of 2.0 at 0.25% fee = 2.0 * 0.0025 * 365 = 182.5% APR

This is a theoretical maximum — actual LP returns depend on impermanent loss, position range (for concentrated liquidity), and fee share.

---

5. Pool Health Metrics

### Core Metrics


pool_health = {
    "tvl_usd": 150_000,          # Total value locked
    "volume_24h_usd": 300_000,   # 24-hour trading volume
    "volume_tvl_ratio": 2.0,     # Volume efficiency
    "fee_apr_estimate": 182.5,   # Annualized fee rate (%)
    "pool_age_hours": 720,       # Time since creation
    "lp_count_estimate": 45,     # Number of LP positions
    "tvl_trend_24h": -0.05,      # TVL change (-5%)
    "price_change_24h": 0.12,    # Price change (+12%)
}

### Red Flags

Watch for these warning signs when evaluating pools:

| Red Flag | Threshold | Risk |

|----------|-----------|------|

| Very new pool | < 24 hours old | Rug pull, unvetted token |

| Single LP | LP count = 1 | Creator can pull all liquidity |

| Declining TVL | > 20% drop in 24h | Liquidity flight |

| Zero volume | No trades in 6h+ | Dead or abandoned |

| Extreme V/TVL | > 10x | Wash trading, bot manipulation |

| Tiny TVL | < $1,000 | Massive slippage on any trade |

### Health Score Algorithm


def compute_health_score(
    tvl_usd: float,
    volume_24h: float,
    pool_age_hours: float,
    lp_count: int,
    tvl_change_24h: float,
) -> float:

Score breakdown

Trigger
7.0
Description states What (pool mechanics comparison, fee structures, pool types, creation patterns, volume efficiency) with rich domain keywords; no when/when-not in description; body provides related-skill routing (lp-math, liquidity-analysis, slippage-modeling).
Structure
9.3
383-line SKILL.md, two references, two scripts; Files section maps roles; no redundant files; content is dense but within the 500-line guidance.
Workflow
8.4
Task-relevant design: red-flag thresholds act as guards, health-score and pool-ranking algorithms give deterministic procedures, workflow example shows end-to-end fetch->score->rank, demo mode provides verification; some sections are reference tables rather than steps.
Content
9.0
Dense factual tables and code with concrete program IDs and thresholds; a few long enumerative sections read more as catalog than instruction.
Engineering
10.0
Valid frontmatter; scripts have shebangs, dependency docs, graceful ImportError handling, timeouts, demo mode; all referenced paths exist.
Security
10.0
6.0 manifest: data reads none beyond CLI args; side effects none; network only to official keyless DexScreener API; credentials none; persistence none. Capabilities match declared scope. No-advice disclaimer present. No injection, no destructive commands.
Comprehensive Solana AMM pool-mechanics reference: per-DEX program IDs and fee tiers (Raydium V4/CLMM, Orca Whirlpool, Meteora DLMM/Dynamic, PumpSwap), PumpFun graduation lifecycle, volume-efficiency interpretation bands, red-flag table, a 5-component health-score algorithm, and execution-pool ranking. Scripts fetch only DexScreener (keyless) with a --demo mode. No-advice disclaimer at the end of SKILL.md. 6.0 manifest: network destinations api.dexscreener.com / dexscreener.com links only (official, declared); no credentials, no file writes, no persistence; capabilities match declared scope. Analysis-only skill, no trade execution.