← Back to list
⚡

dispatching-parallel-agents Checked

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dep…
⚡ Productivity skills By obra Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-07 Updated 2026-09-07 Source ↗
8.5Overall rating
2Views
5Downloads
282.5kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "dispatching-parallel-agents" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/dispatching-parallel-agents.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/dispatching-parallel-agents.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 3 KB
📊 Static rating
8.5/10
Trigger
6.0
Structure
8.7
Workflow
8.4
Content
9.0
Engineering
10.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Documentation

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Overview

You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.

When you have multiple unrelated failures (different test files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigating them sequentially wastes time. Each investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.

**Core principle:** Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.

When to Use


digraph when_to_use {
    "Multiple failures?" [shape=diamond];
    "Are they independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Single agent investigates all" [shape=box];
    "One agent per problem domain" [shape=box];
    "Can they work in parallel?" [shape=diamond];
    "Sequential agents" [shape=box];
    "Parallel dispatch" [shape=box];

    "Multiple failures?" -> "Are they independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Are they independent?" -> "Single agent investigates all" [label="no - related"];
    "Are they independent?" -> "Can they work in parallel?" [label="yes"];
    "Can they work in parallel?" -> "Parallel dispatch" [label="yes"];
    "Can they work in parallel?" -> "Sequential agents" [label="no - shared state"];
}

**Use when:**

  • 3+ test files failing with different root causes
  • Multiple subsystems broken independently
  • Each problem can be understood without context from others
  • No shared state between investigations

**Don't use when:**

  • Failures are related (fix one might fix others)
  • Need to understand full system state
  • Agents would interfere with each other

The Pattern

### 1. Identify Independent Domains

Group failures by what's broken:

  • File A tests: Tool approval flow
  • File B tests: Batch completion behavior
  • File C tests: Abort functionality

Each domain is independent - fixing tool approval doesn't affect abort tests.

### 2. Create Focused Agent Tasks

Each agent gets:

  • **Specific scope:** One test file or subsystem
  • **Clear goal:** Make these tests pass
  • **Constraints:** Don't change other code
  • **Expected output:** Summary of what you found and fixed

### 3. Dispatch in Parallel

Issue all three subagent dispatches in the same response — they run in parallel:


Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures"
Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures"
Subagent (general-purpose): "Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures"
# All three run concurrently.

Multiple dispatch calls in one response = parallel execution. One per response = sequential.

### 4. Review and Integrate

View full documentation

When agents return:

  • Read each summary
  • Verify fixes don't conflict
  • Run full test suite
  • Integrate all changes

Agent Prompt Structure

Good agent prompts are:

1. **Focused** - One clear problem domain

2. **Self-contained** - All context needed to understand the problem

3. **Specific about output** - What should the agent return?


Fix the 3 failing tests in src/agents/agent-tool-abort.test.ts:

1. "should abort tool with partial output capture" - expects 'interrupted at' in message
2. "should handle mixed completed and aborted tools" - fast tool aborted instead of completed
3. "should properly track pendingToolCount" - expects 3 results but gets 0

These are timing/race condition issues. Your task:

1. Read the test file and understand what each test verifies
2. Identify root cause - timing issues or actual bugs?
3. Fix by:
   - Replacing arbitrary timeouts with event-based waiting
   - Fixing bugs in abort implementation if found
   - Adjusting test expectations if testing changed behavior

Do NOT just increase timeouts - find the real issue.

Return: Summary of what you found and what you fixed.

Common Mistakes

**❌ Too broad:** "Fix all the tests" - agent gets lost

**✅ Specific:** "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts" - focused scope

**❌ No context:** "Fix the race condition" - agent doesn't know where

**✅ Context:** Paste the error messages and test names

**❌ No constraints:** Agent might refactor everything

**✅ Constraints:** "Do NOT change production code" or "Fix tests only"

**❌ Vague output:** "Fix it" - you don't know what changed

**✅ Specific:** "Return summary of root cause and changes"

When NOT to Use

**Related failures:** Fixing one might fix others - investigate together first

**Need full context:** Understanding requires seeing entire system

**Exploratory debugging:** You don't know what's broken yet

**Shared state:** Agents would interfere (editing same files, using same resources)

Real Example from Session

**Scenario:** 6 test failures across 3 files after major refactoring

**Failures:**

  • agent-tool-abort.test.ts: 3 failures (timing issues)
  • batch-completion-behavior.test.ts: 2 failures (tools not executing)
  • tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts: 1 failure (execution count = 0)

**Decision:** Independent domains - abort logic separate from batch completion separate from race conditions

**Dispatch:**


Agent 1 → Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts
Agent 2 → Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts
Agent 3 → Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts

**Results:**

  • Agent 1: Replaced timeouts with event-based waiting
  • Agent 2: Fixed event structure bug (threadId in wrong place)
  • Agent 3: Added wait for async tool execution to complete

**Integration:** All fixes independent, no conflicts, full suite green

Verification

After agents return:

1. **Review each summary** - Understand what changed

2. **Check for conflicts** - Did agents edit same code?

3. **Run full suite** - Verify all fixes work together

4. **Spot check** - Agents can make systematic errors

Score breakdown

Trigger
6.0
Clear When with independence criteria and in-body When-Not list, but description itself lacks explicit exclusions and rich synonyms.
Structure
8.7
Single 167-line file, right-sized, clean structure, no redundant files.
Workflow
8.4
Four-step dispatch pattern with scoping rules, constraint-carrying prompts, conflict checks, and full-suite plus spot-check verification.
Content
9.0
Concrete good/bad prompt examples and a real session walkthrough; imperative and tight.
Engineering
10.0
Valid frontmatter; no scripts; no file references to verify.
Security
10.0
No scripts, no network, no injection, no secrets.
Well-focused orchestration pattern for independent parallel subagents, with clear independence gates, prompt-structure guidance and post-merge verification; single-file design is appropriate.