← Back to list
📣

fit-scorer Checked

Use when the user asks to "score this influencer", "rank these creators for our campaign", or "te…
📣 Marketing skills By aaron-he-zhu Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-03 Updated 2026-09-03 Source ↗
8.2Overall rating
2Views
6Downloads
2.7kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "fit-scorer" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/fit-scorer.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/fit-scorer.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 12 KB
📊 Static rating
8.2/10
Trigger
9.0
Structure
8.7
Workflow
8.4
Content
7.0
Engineering
5.0
Security
9.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Use when the user asks to "score this influencer", "rank these creators for our campaign", or "tell me which influencer is the best fit"; produces the typed STAR Suitability (S) read plus a separately labeled campaign-fit ranking without mixing campaign-specific commercial fit into the Suitability read. Not for finding new influencers — use influencer-discovery; not for sending outreach — use outreach-manager. 达人适配度评分/创作者筛选排名

Fit Scorer

Score each shortlisted creator on the typed STAR **Suitability (S)** dimension, then keep deal-specific commercial fit in a separate prioritization matrix. Suitability includes the STAR-S8 brand/category and audience-brand evidence that is independent of any single deal; deal terms, availability, and campaign orchestration stay outside it. The commercial matrix is not a Suitability score and never enters the SQS.

Documentation

Use when the user asks to "score this influencer", "rank these creators for our campaign", or "tell me which influencer is the best fit"; produces the typed STAR Suitability (S) read plus a separately labeled campaign-fit ranking without mixing campaign-specific commercial fit into the Suitability read. Not for finding new influencers — use influencer-discovery; not for sending outreach — use outreach-manager. 达人适配度评分/创作者筛选排名

Fit Scorer

Score each shortlisted creator on the typed STAR **Suitability (S)** dimension, then keep deal-specific commercial fit in a separate prioritization matrix. Suitability includes the STAR-S8 brand/category and audience-brand evidence that is independent of any single deal; deal terms, availability, and campaign orchestration stay outside it. The commercial matrix is not a Suitability score and never enters the SQS.

Quick Start

Score one influencer:


Score @[handle] for [brand/campaign] and tell me if they're a good fit

Compare and rank a shortlist:


Compare and rank these influencers for [campaign]: @influencer1, @influencer2, @influencer3

Skill Contract

  • **Reads**: brand/campaign context, target audience definition, campaign goal, and shortlist entries carrying a stable opaque creator_ref plus either transient handles/profile URLs or resolvable opaque handle refs (supplied by the user or carried over from influencer-discovery). Optional prior audience profiles from memory/influencer/audience-mapper/, competitor partner benchmarks from memory/influencer/competitor-tracker/, and a WARM Campaign Retro Card's evidence_refs plus next_campaign_hypothesis when the user supplies or authorizes that handoff. For rostered creators, read partnership history and audience-stat provenance from memory/creators/<aggregate-id>.md — the creator-registry (../../../protocol/creator-registry/SKILL.md) roster record — as Partnership Potential inputs.
  • **Writes**: return the typed Suitability (S) read and separately labeled commercial-fit comparison inline by default; when a Retro Card is supplied, preserve its hypothesis as a separately labeled next-cycle test constraint with no score or verdict effect. Save the report to memory/influencer/fit-scorer/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md only with exact WARM-save authorization. Saved reports and handoffs retain the stable opaque creator_ref and opaque evidence refs, never a raw handle, name, profile URL, email, provider ID, or deterministic hash in creator_ref.
  • **Promotes**: only with separate exact authorization, promote evidence-backed top picks and their exact Suitability (S) read and catalog version to memory/hot-cache.md; never promote an unscored/provisional result or the Retro Card's qualitative decision/hypothesis as scored truth.
  • **Done when**:
  • Every creator has all 10 Suitability items S1–S10 explicitly Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A with dated evidence or a gap reason.
  • Every creator's stable opaque creator_ref is prese
View full documentation

rved from discovery/registry or generated once for this lineage; raw identity locators remain transient.

  • The typed goal/context and the Suitability item states are preserved for the gate; Unknown prevents a Suitability read.
  • Any commercial-fit ranking is visibly separate from the Suitability read and cannot override a veto or missing evidence.
  • If a Retro Card is supplied, its next_campaign_hypothesis is visible only as a falsifiable test constraint/commercial-matrix context; its evidence_refs are pointers for fresh investigation, not STAR item evidence or an automatic selection rule.
  • **Primary next skill**: campaign-planner (../../target/campaign-planner/SKILL.md) — turn the ranked shortlist into an approved campaign plan. If that plan is already approved and outreach-ready, hand off to outreach-manager (../../activate/outreach-manager/SKILL.md) instead; competitor benchmarking is optional.

### Handoff Summary

> Emit the standard shape from skill-contract.md §Handoff Summary Format (../../../references/skill-contract.md).

Data Sources

This family needs no live integrations (Tier 1). Fit Scorer works end to end by asking the user for the inputs it scores — transient handles or profile locators, audience targets, brand values, and any metrics they have. A connector sharpens the numbers but none is required.

  • ~~influencer database — follower counts, audience demographics, and partnership history.
  • ~~social platform analytics — engagement rate, comment quality samples, posting cadence, growth trend.
  • ~~audience intelligence — real-vs-bot follower estimates and audience overlap with your target.
  • **Roster record (keyless Tier 1)** — prior contact, response reputation, and delivery history come from memory/creators/<aggregate-id>.md when the creator is rostered (creator-registry (../../../protocol/creator-registry/SKILL.md) curates it); ~~CRM is an optional Tier-2 sharpener for the same history when no roster record exists.

**Measured YouTube inputs (free key)**: for YouTube candidates, python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/connectors/youtube.py" videos @handle --limit 10 supplies the engagement-authenticity inputs directly — per-video views/likes/comments against the displayed subscriber base (views-to-subs consistency, comment rate, cadence) — so those sub-scores come from **Measured** numbers instead of screenshots. Free YOUTUBE_API_KEY; shortlist vetting only (ToS refuses bulk-harvesting quota). See scripts/connectors/README.md (../../../scripts/connectors/README.md).

With zero integrations, ask the user to supply each value the scoring tables request; the framework and weighting still produce a defensible ranking. See CONNECTORS.md (../../../CONNECTORS.md) for the free/keyless recipe per category.

Instructions

The contract-compatible copied layouts live in references/scoring-templates.md (references/scoring-templates.md): use the creator_ref-only typed STAR-S1–STAR-S10 evidence table for the Suitability read, then the optional commercial_fit_score tables for separate decision support. Never copy a raw locator into those outputs.

1. **Lock identity and typed context.** Reuse the opaque creator_ref explicitly carried by discovery, or a creator-registry aggregate ID only when its handle link is verified. If the user supplies only a raw handle/profile URL and no verified aggregate exists, generate one random creator-<UUIDv4> and reuse it unchanged across this report, any authorized save, and downstream handoffs. Never set creator_ref to a raw handle, name, URL, email, provider ID, or deterministic hash of one; keep those locators transient for evidence acquisition. Resolve an opaque ref only through its accompanying authorized artifact or verified registry link. If neither is available, request the transient locator and preserve the identity as unresolved rather than guessing or merging. Then require the creator target and target version, named STAR profile/goal (awareness|engagement|conversion|brand-building), assessment_time: forecast|actual, shared campaign rollup_id, observation date, platform/tier/niche cohort, evidence window, material context object, and current STAR catalog_version — the exact typed identity the gate will reuse. If any field is absent, do not invent it: return NEEDS_INPUT, name the missing fields, and preserve the supplied identity unchanged for resume. When a Campaign Retro Card is supplied, record its evidence_refs and next_campaign_hypothesis in a separate non-scoring prior-cycle context block; neither becomes part of the STAR typed identity.

2. **Freeze evidence for the current window.** Use current creator analytics, public observations, roster history, and cohort benchmarks with source/date/type/confidence. A Retro Card and its evidence_refs are discovery pointers only, never STAR item evidence. If a referenced primary source is independently reacquired and qualifies in the current evidence window, cite that fresh observation rather than the card. Missing or refused private access is Unknown, never Fail or Partial.

3. **Score Suitability only.** Evaluate the Suitability items S1–S10 (audience composition/realness, follower-growth integrity, reach reliability, engagement health and authenticity, credibility, and deal-independent brand/category fit) from star-benchmark.md (../../../references/star-benchmark.md)

Score breakdown

Trigger
9.0
Strong quoted triggers and When-Not boundaries plus Chinese tag, though phrasing is long and dense
Structure
8.7
Good offload of tables to 386-line reference, SKILL.md at 112 lines but prose-heavy
Workflow
8.4
Strict typed-state scoring with Unknown gating, control handoff, and done-when criteria, though step 1 is overloaded
Content
7.0
Dense run-on sentences hurt readability despite good tables and imperative style
Engineering
5.0
Valid frontmatter but star-benchmark, connectors script and sibling paths do not exist in the zip
Security
9.0
Privacy-first opaque refs, WARM authorization for saves, YouTube connector script not shipped but referenced
Rigorous typed scoring skill with opaque-ref privacy design and Unknown gating, but instructions are extremely dense and verbose, and many sibling links dangle in the bundle.