← Back to list
list-hygiene-monitor ✓ Security reviewed
Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscriber…
⚡ Productivity By aaron-he-zhu Version v1.0.0 Updated 2026-09-03
7.7Overall rating

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "list-hygiene-monitor" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/list-hygiene-monitor.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/list-hygiene-monitor.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 9 KB

About this skill

Overview

Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理

Source

  • Repo: https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
  • Path: email/setup/list-hygiene-monitor

Evaluation

AI-evaluated 2026-09-03: Precise cohort bands, trend-vs-baseline deltas via a ledger script, and a segmented re-permission/sunset/prune worklist with done-when criteria and escalation stops. Niche and tied to the SEND framework suite, but security is excellent: opaque subject refs only, raw addresses never persisted, untrusted-export handling, and leakage routed to the auditor instead of self-verdicting.

Score breakdown

Quality
8.0
Usability
6.0
Security
9.0
Popularity
7.0