← Back to list
⚡

prioritization-frameworks Checked

Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates…
⚡ Productivity skills By phuryn Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-03 Updated 2026-09-03 Source ↗
6.7Overall rating
2Views
6Downloads
26.0kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "prioritization-frameworks" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/prioritization-frameworks.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/prioritization-frameworks.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 2 KB
📊 Static rating
6.7/10
Trigger
7.0
Structure
8.0
Workflow
2.4
Content
8.0
Engineering
8.0
Security
9.5

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.

Documentation

Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.

Prioritization Frameworks Reference

A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context.

### Core Principle

Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize **problems (opportunities)**, not features.

### Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*)

The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems.

Survey customers on **Importance** and **Satisfaction** for each need (normalize to 0–1 scale).

Three related formulas:

  • **Current value** = Importance × Satisfaction
  • **Opportunity Score** = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction)
  • **Customer value created** = Importance × (S2 − S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after

High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot. Prioritizes customer problems, not solutions.

### ICE Framework

Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors.

  • **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score × Number of Customers affected
  • **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk.
  • **E** (Ease) = How easy is it to implement? (1-10). Accounts for economic factors.

**Score** = I × C × E. Higher = prioritize first.

### RICE Framework

Splits ICE's Impact into two separate factors. Useful for larger teams that need more granularity.

  • **R** (Reach) = Number of customers affected
  • **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score (value per customer)
  • **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (0-100%)
  • **E** (Effort) = How much effort to implement? (person-months)

**Score** = (R × I × C) / E

### 9 Frameworks Overview

View full documentation

| Framework | Best For | Key Insight |

|-----------|----------|-------------|

| Eisenhower Matrix | Personal tasks | Urgent vs Important — for individual PM task management |

| Impact vs Effort | Tasks/initiatives | Simple 2×2 — quick triage, not rigorous for strategic decisions |

| Risk vs Reward | Initiatives | Like Impact vs Effort but accounts for uncertainty |

| **Opportunity Score** | Customer problems | **Recommended.** Importance × (1 − Satisfaction). Normalize to 0–1. |

| Kano Model | Understanding expectations | Must-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, Reverse. For understanding, not prioritizing. |

| Weighted Decision Matrix | Multi-factor decisions | Assign weights to criteria, score each option. Useful for stakeholder buy-in. |

| **ICE** | Ideas/initiatives | Impact × Confidence × Ease. Recommended for quick prioritization. |

| **RICE** | Ideas at scale | (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort. Adds Reach to ICE. |

| MoSCoW | Requirements | Must/Should/Could/Won't. Caution: project management origin. |

### Templates

---

### Further Reading

Score breakdown

Trigger
7.0
Description covers What and When with compare-and-learn triggers; no When-Not and no Chinese keywords.
Structure
8.0
75-line single-file reference; clean sections and comparison table; appropriate size with no extra files.
Workflow
2.4
Reference-guide pattern: zero execution steps or commands; only a Best-For column gives selection guidance; no error handling or checks.
Content
8.0
Dense, correct, formula-first writing with clear recommendations; body starts with an H2 instead of H1.
Engineering
8.0
Valid frontmatter; no scripts; Google Drive template links attributed but not verifiable; no missing internal paths.
Security
9.5
No scripts, secrets, injection, or exfiltration; external links are Google Drive and a PM newsletter, all plausible.
Accurate, well-organized reference of 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas and templates; purely descriptive with no procedure, steps, or verification design.