← Back to list
🛠️

replica-diff Checked

Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weigh…
🛠️ Developer Tools skills By Jakeschincariol Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-10-12 Updated 2026-10-12 Source ↗
9.2Overall rating
0Views
0Downloads
1.9kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "replica-diff" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/replica-diff.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/replica-diff.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 10 KB
📊 Static rating
9.2/10
Trigger
7.5
Structure
8.0
Workflow
10.0
Content
10.0
Engineering
10.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weighted by must, should, could) with the missing list in build order, plus a screenshot layout diff that ignores colour so a rebrand does not count against you. Two standard-library Python tools. Use when the user says "how close is my clone", "compare it to the original", "what's missing", "parity check", "diff the screens", "is it ready", or after /replica-test.

replica-diff

Two tools in this folder, both standard-library Python, no installs:


python3 parity.py replica/features.csv                         # feature parity + missing list
python3 imgdiff.py replica/screens/S07.png replica/clone-screens/S07.png --out diff-S07.png
python3 imgdiff.py a.png b.png --json > replica/diffs/S07.json # for parity.py --visual
python3 parity.py replica/features.csv --visual replica/diffs/*.json --markdown > replica/parity.md

Documentation

Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weighted by must, should, could) with the missing list in build order, plus a screenshot layout diff that ignores colour so a rebrand does not count against you. Two standard-library Python tools. Use when the user says "how close is my clone", "compare it to the original", "what's missing", "parity check", "diff the screens", "is it ready", or after /replica-test.

replica-diff

Two tools in this folder, both standard-library Python, no installs:


python3 parity.py replica/features.csv                         # feature parity + missing list
python3 imgdiff.py replica/screens/S07.png replica/clone-screens/S07.png --out diff-S07.png
python3 imgdiff.py a.png b.png --json > replica/diffs/S07.json # for parity.py --visual
python3 parity.py replica/features.csv --visual replica/diffs/*.json --markdown > replica/parity.md

What parity means here

**Parity means it does the same job, not that it looks the same.** The

feature score is the number that matters: can a user do everything they could

do in the original. The layout score checks structure (is the information in

the same places, in the same hierarchy), because that is what makes a switcher

feel at home. It deliberately ignores colour, because replica-brand changes

every colour on purpose. Do not chase pixel parity with the original. Its

exact look is its trade dress, and it changes before launch.

Step 1: feature parity

Make sure replica/features.csv is current: every row's clone column is

yes, partial (with a note), no, or skip (with a reason). Then:


python3 parity.py replica/features.csv

It weights must 3, should 2, could 1, counts partial as half, leaves out

skip rows and rows you added that the original does not have, and prints:

the score, must-haves done of total, each area weakest first, and the missing

list in build order. Must-haves not done means not shippable, and it says so.

Step 2: layout diff

For each key screen, take two screenshots at the **same viewport** (1440x900

desktop, 390x844 mobile) in the **same state** (same data shape, same tab

open, logged in the same way). The original's come from public pages or the

user's own account, saved in replica/screens/. The clone's go in

replica/clone-screens/.


python3 imgdiff.py replica/screens/S07.png replica/clone-screens/S07.png --out replica/diffs/S07.png

Layout mode (default) turns both into edge maps, cuts them into a grid, and

compares where things are, scoring only cells with something in them. It

reports the score (matches 90+, close 75+, partly 50+, different), the

regions that differ (in the original's pixel coordinates, biggest first), and

a height difference if the clone's page is much longer or shorter. Retina and

non-retina screenshots compare fine: both are scaled to the same width.

View full documentation

--mode pixel is exact comparison. Use it for your own regressions (clone

today against clone last week), not against the original.

Step 3: behaviour diff

Walk each flow in both apps and compare what the scores cannot see: clicks to

finish the core flow, what happens on errors, what is remembered between

visits, what emails arrive. Fewer clicks than the original is a win. Write

each difference as: flow, original does, clone does, fix or keep.

Step 4: the report

replica/parity.md: overall score, feature score, layout score per screen,

missing features in build order, behaviour differences, and a verdict:

  • **not shippable**: any must-have missing, or any open S1 bug
  • **shippable**: all must-haves done, feature score 80+, no open S1 or S2
  • **better than the original**: shippable, plus fixes from

replica-entrepreneur. This is the goal. A straight copy has no reason to exist.

Give honest numbers. A clone at 62% is at 62%.

Output

replica/parity.md, the diff images, and the top five things to build next.

Then /replica-build for the gaps, or /replica-entrepreneur if parity is

there.

Score breakdown

Trigger
7.5
What (parity score + layout diff, two tools) and When (six quoted phrasings plus 'after /replica-test') clear; good synonyms (compare/how close/what's missing/parity check/diff); no explicit When-Not.
Structure
8.0
94-line SKILL.md plus two scripts; scripts at skill root rather than scripts/ (minor role mixing); no references/assets, no redundant docs; commands and modes documented inline.
Workflow
10.0
Reviewer/measurement pattern executed excellently: four ordered steps with deterministic scripts for scoring and CI-able gates (--fail-under, exit 1, not-shippable verdict), high freedom only where judgment is needed (behaviour diff, fix-or-keep calls), thorough script error handling (missing CSV columns, unknown priorities, interlaced PNG refusal, truncated data, zlib errors), and verification is the skill's whole output (report with verdict thresholds).
Content
10.0
Tight imperative prose; every command copyable with arguments; scoring weights, thresholds and file locations all concrete; consistent formatting.
Engineering
10.0
Valid frontmatter; both scripts have shebangs, argparse usage, and declared stdlib-only dependency story; all referenced paths are suite conventions that exist; sibling skills referenced exist.
Security
10.0
Capability manifest: reads replica/features.csv, PNG screenshots and imgdiff JSON outputs; writes diff PNGs and replica/parity.md; no network, no credential access, no persistence, no dynamic execution, hand-rolled PNG decoding is pure local computation. Capabilities match declared scope.
Measurement stage of the replica-* suite: weighted feature parity from the CSV matrix plus a colour-blind screenshot layout diff, via two substantial standard-library-only Python tools (parity.py, imgdiff.py - the latter includes a complete PNG decoder/writer, no Pillow needed). Best-in-suite workflow: deterministic scoring scripts usable as build gates (--fail-under, 'must-haves not done means not shippable'), a thoughtful layout-vs-pixel mode split that avoids trade-dress chasing, a manual behaviour-diff step for what scores cannot see, and an explicit honesty rule ('a clone at 62% is at 62%'). Same structural nit as siblings: scripts sit at the skill root instead of scripts/; no When-Not in description.