← Back to list
⚡

shipping-and-launch Checked

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production. Use when you need a pre…
⚡ Productivity skills By addyosmani Version v1.0.cda4542 Added 2026-09-07 Updated 2026-09-22 Source ↗
8.2Overall rating
2Views
5Downloads
92.6kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "shipping-and-launch" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/shipping-and-launch.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/shipping-and-launch.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.cda4542 · 5 KB
📊 Static rating
8.2/10
Trigger
7.0
Structure
6.7
Workflow
8.4
Content
9.0
Engineering
8.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.

Shipping and Launch

Documentation

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.

Shipping and Launch

Overview

Ship with confidence. The goal is not just to deploy — it's to deploy safely, with monitoring in place, a rollback plan ready, and a clear understanding of what success looks like. Every launch should be reversible, observable, and incremental.

When to Use

  • Deploying a feature to production for the first time
  • Releasing a significant change to users
  • Migrating data or infrastructure
  • Opening a beta or early access program
  • Any deployment that carries risk (all of them)

The Pre-Launch Checklist

### Code Quality

  • [ ] All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
  • [ ] Build succeeds with no warnings
  • [ ] Lint and type checking pass
  • [ ] Code reviewed and approved
  • [ ] No TODO comments that should be resolved before launch
  • [ ] No console.log debugging statements in production code
  • [ ] Error handling covers expected failure modes

### Security

  • [ ] No secrets in code or version control
  • [ ] The ecosystem's dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit, cargo audit, ...) shows no critical or high vulnerabilities
  • [ ] Input validation on all user-facing endpoints
  • [ ] Authentication and authorization checks in place
  • [ ] Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
  • [ ] Rate limiting on authentication endpoints
  • [ ] CORS configured to specific origins (not wildcard)

### Performance

  • [ ] Core Web Vitals within "Good" thresholds
  • [ ] No N+1 queries in critical paths
  • [ ] Images optimized (compression, responsive sizes, lazy loading)
  • [ ] Bundle size within budget
  • [ ] Database queries have appropriate indexes
  • [ ] Caching configured for static assets and repeated queries

### Accessibility

  • [ ] Keyboard navigation works for all interactive elements
  • [ ] Screen reader can convey page content and structure
  • [ ] Color contrast meets WCAG 2.1 AA (4.5:1 for text)
  • [ ] Focus management correct for modals and dynamic content
  • [ ] Error messages are descriptive and associated with form fields
  • [ ] No accessibility warnings in axe-core or Lighthouse

### Infrastructure

  • [ ] Environment variables set in production
  • [ ] Database migrations applied (or ready to apply)
  • [ ] DNS and SSL configured
  • [ ] CDN configured for static assets
  • [ ] Logging and error reporting configured
  • [ ] Health check endpoint exists and responds

### Documentation

  • [ ] README updated with any new setup requirements
  • [ ] API documentation current
  • [ ] ADRs written for any architectural decisions
  • [ ] Changelog updated
  • [ ] User-facing documentation updated (if applicable)

Feature Flag Strategy

Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release:


// Feature flag check
const flags = await getFeatureFlags(userId);
View full documentation

if (flags.taskSharing) {

// New feature: task sharing

return <TaskSharingPanel task={task} />;

}

// Default: existing behavior

return null;



**Feature flag lifecycle:**

1. DEPLOY with flag OFF → Code is in production but inactive

2. ENABLE for team/beta → Internal testing in production environment

3. GRADUAL ROLLOUT → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100% of users

4. MONITOR at each stage → Watch error rates, performance, user feedback

5. CLEAN UP → Remove flag and dead code path after full rollout



**Rules:**
- Every feature flag has an owner and an expiration date
- Clean up flags within 2 weeks of full rollout
- Don't nest feature flags (creates exponential combinations)
- Test both flag states (on and off) in CI

## Staged Rollout

### The Rollout Sequence

1. DEPLOY to staging

└── Full test suite in staging environment

└── Manual smoke test of critical flows

2. DEPLOY to production (feature flag OFF)

└── Verify deployment succeeded (health check)

└── Check error monitoring (no new errors)

3. ENABLE for team (flag ON for internal users)

└── Team uses the feature in production

└── 24-hour monitoring window

4. CANARY rollout (flag ON for 5% of users)

└── Monitor error rates, latency, user behavior

└── Compare metrics: canary vs. baseline

└── 24-48 hour monitoring window

└── Advance only if all thresholds pass (see table below)

5. GRADUAL increase (25% -> 50% -> 100%)

└── Same monitoring at each step

└── Ability to roll back to previous percentage at any point

6. FULL rollout (flag ON for all users)

└── Monitor for 1 week

└── Clean up feature flag



### Rollout Decision Thresholds

Use these thresholds to decide whether to advance, hold, or roll back at each stage:

| Metric | Advance (green) | Hold and investigate (yellow) | Roll back (red) |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-----------------|
| Error rate | Within 10% of baseline | 10-100% above baseline | >2x baseline |
| P95 latency | Within 20% of baseline | 20-50% above baseline | >50% above baseline |
| Client JS errors | No new error types | New errors at <0.1% of sessions | New errors at >0.1% of sessions |
| Business metrics | Neutral or positive | Decline <5% (may be noise) | Decline >5% |

### When to Roll Back

Roll back immediately if:
- Error rate increases by more than 2x baseline
- P95 latency increases by more than 50%
- User-reported issues spike
- Data integrity issues detected
- Security vulnerability discovered

## Monitoring and Observability

### What to Monitor

Application metrics:

├── Error rate (total and by endpoint)

├── Response time (p50, p95, p99)

├── Request volume

├── Active users

└── Key business metrics (conversion, engagement)

Infrastructure metrics:

├── CPU and memory utilization

├── Database connection pool usage

├── Disk space

├── Network latency

└── Queue depth (if applicable)

Client metrics:

├── Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS)

├── JavaScript errors

├── API error rates from client perspective

└── Page load time



### Error Reporting

// Set up error boundary with reporting

class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {

componentDidCatch(error: Error, info: React.ErrorInfo) {

// Report to error tracking service

reportError(error, {

componentStack: info.componentStack,

userId: getCurrentUser()?.id,

page: window.location.pathname,

});

}

render() {

if (this.state.hasError) {

return <ErrorFallback onRetry={() => this.setState({ hasError: false })} />;

}

return this.props.children;

}

}

// Server-side error reporting

app.use((err: Error, req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {

reportError(err, {

method: req.method,

url: req.url,

userId: req.user?.id,

});

// Don't expose internals to users

res.status(500).json({

error: { code: 'INTERNAL_ERROR', message: 'Something went wrong' },

});

});



### Post-Launch Verification

In the first hour after launch:

1. Check health endpoint returns 200

2. Check error monitoring dashboard (no new error types)

3. Check latency dashboard (no regression)

4. Test the critical user flow manually

5. Verify logs are flowing and readable

6. Confirm rollback mechanism works (dry run if possible)



## Error Budget Release Gate

Your service's error budget — the fraction of requests or time your SLO allows to fail — determines whether it's safe to ship. Use it as an objective gate — not a negotiation:

Budget remaining > 20% → Ship normally; monitor closely

Budget remaining 0–20% → Slow rollouts only; no high-risk changes

Budget exhausted → Freeze feature work; focus entirely on reliability

Budget resets → Resume normal pace; bake in the fix that recovered it



A high burn rate during a canary (consuming budget faster than the baseline pace) is a **hold** signal in the rollout thresholds table above — treat it the same as an elevated error rate.

## Rollback Strategy

Every deployment needs a rollback plan before it happens:

Rollback Plan for [Feature/Release]

### Trigger Conditions

  • Error rate > 2x baseline
  • P95 latency > [X]ms
  • User reports of [specific issue]

#

Score breakdown

Trigger
7.0
Rich When scenarios and launch synonyms but no When-Not exclusion anywhere.
Structure
6.7
330-line single file; four ../../references/ checklist files cited but not shipped.
Workflow
8.4
Strong gates: rollout thresholds table, rollback triggers, error budget policy, and pre/post-deploy checklists, though partly knowledge-style lists.
Content
9.0
Mostly crisp imperative checklists with concrete commands and code examples.
Engineering
8.0
Valid frontmatter and no scripts, but all four referenced reference files are missing paths.
Security
10.0
No scripts, no egress, no secrets, no injection; clean.
Comprehensive launch skill with staged rollout thresholds, error budget gate, rollback template, and pre/post verification checklists; loses points for missing When-Not boundaries and four referenced checklist files absent from the package.

Assessment methodology

🧪
AI-assessed
Evaluated by automated analysis across quality, usability, and security dimensions. This is not a substitute for your own review — always inspect a skill before installing it.

Version history

v1.0.cda4542 2026-09-22
5 KB

— Refreshed from GitHub addyosmani/agent-skills@cda4542

v1.0.0 2026-09-07
5 KB

Imported from addyosmani/agent-skills@main