← Back to list
⚡

verification-before-completion Checked

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - …
⚡ Productivity skills By obra Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-07 Updated 2026-09-07 Source ↗ Part of Testing & Code Quality →
9.1Overall rating
2Views
6Downloads
282.5kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "verification-before-completion" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/verification-before-completion.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/verification-before-completion.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 2 KB
📊 Static rating
9.1/10
Trigger
8.5
Structure
8.7
Workflow
8.8
Content
9.0
Engineering
10.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Verification Before Completion

Documentation

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Verification Before Completion

Overview

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**

The Iron Law


NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function


BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |

|-------|----------|----------------|

| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |

| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |

| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |

| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |

| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |

| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |

| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • Tired and wanting work over
  • **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

Rationalization Prevention

| Excuse | Reality |

|--------|---------|

| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |

| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |

| "Just this once" | No exceptions |

| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |

| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |

| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |

| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |

| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |

Key Patterns

**Tests:**


✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**


✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

**Build:**


✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
View full documentation

**Requirements:**


✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

**Agent delegation:**


✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:**

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

**Rule applies to:**

  • Exact phrases
  • Paraphrases and synonyms
  • Implications of success
  • ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

Score breakdown

Trigger
8.5
Trigger description covers complete/fixed/passing claims, commits and PRs with evidence requirement; keyword set solid.
Structure
8.7
Compact 120-line single file perfectly sized for an always-on discipline skill; zero redundancy.
Workflow
8.8
Gate-function workflow with explicit verify-or-report-failure loop, rationalization table and regression red-green check.
Content
9.0
Terse imperative rules with concrete good/bad examples; every line drives action.
Engineering
10.0
Valid frontmatter; no scripts or file references to break.
Security
10.0
Pure behavioral guidance; no code, network, secrets, or injection surface.
Exemplary discipline skill: clear trigger description, five-step gate function, failure table, red flags, rationalization counters and red-green regression verification pattern; nothing extraneous.