← Back to list
⚡

linkedin-employee-advocacy Checked

Stand up and run a LinkedIn employee advocacy program for a marketing or sales team. Covers 14-da…
⚡ Productivity skills By sergebulaev Version v1.0.6b78503 Added 2026-09-15 Updated 2026-09-22 Source ↗
8.8Overall rating
2Views
6Downloads
2.4kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "linkedin-employee-advocacy" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/linkedin-employee-advocacy.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/linkedin-employee-advocacy.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.6b78503 · 9 KB
📊 Static rating
8.8/10
Trigger
8.5
Structure
9.3
Workflow
7.6
Content
10.0
Engineering
8.0
Security
10.0

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Stand up and run a LinkedIn employee advocacy program for a marketing or sales team. Covers 14-day launch playbook, brand-guideline governance, per-post time budget, cadence benchmarks, and team ROI (reach, engagement, pipeline). Triggers on \"employee advocacy\", \"get the team posting\", \"scale LinkedIn across team\", \"advocacy ROI\".

LinkedIn Employee Advocacy

Stand up a marketing-team LinkedIn advocacy program that scales without killing authenticity. Employee posts get **8x more engagement** than brand-page posts — this skill operationalizes that advantage.

Documentation

Stand up and run a LinkedIn employee advocacy program for a marketing or sales team. Covers 14-day launch playbook, brand-guideline governance, per-post time budget, cadence benchmarks, and team ROI (reach, engagement, pipeline). Triggers on \"employee advocacy\", \"get the team posting\", \"scale LinkedIn across team\", \"advocacy ROI\".

LinkedIn Employee Advocacy

Stand up a marketing-team LinkedIn advocacy program that scales without killing authenticity. Employee posts get **8x more engagement** than brand-page posts — this skill operationalizes that advantage.

When to use

  • Marketing leader wants to get their team posting on LinkedIn
  • User is planning an advocacy program launch
  • Team is posting but output is inconsistent / off-brand / low-engagement
  • Need ROI measurement framework for an existing program
  • Requests: "how do I get the team posting", "launch advocacy", "scale LinkedIn across 10 people"

Input

  • Team size (5-50 typical)
  • Marketing goal (reach / pipeline / recruiting / thought leadership)
  • Current state (everyone silent / some active / inconsistent)
  • Brand guideline constraints

Output

  • **14-day launch plan** (if cold-starting)
  • **Operating model** (voice capture, ideation, approval, posting, measurement)
  • **Cadence targets** per team member (realistic, not punishing)
  • **KPI dashboard spec** (team reach, engagement, pipeline attribution)
  • **Governance playbook** (brand safety without blocking velocity)

Four operating principles

1. **Scale authentically.** Individuals compose in their own voice, not corporate language. Corporate-tone team posts underperform authentic voice 3x.

2. **Maintain control.** Brand guidelines integrated into the workflow. Review step is **optional, not blocking** — high-trust roles bypass review entirely.

3. **Remove friction.** Per-post time budget: **5 minutes**. Anything more and the program dies in week 3.

4. **Prove ROI.** Track team reach, engagement, pipeline impact. Without attribution, the program gets cut at the first budget review.

Benchmarks

  • **Launch target:** team posting within **14 days**
  • **Active team size benchmark:** 8-11 members
  • **Output benchmark:** 70+ posts/week (at 8 members) or 3-5 posts/member/week
  • **Per-post time budget:** 5 minutes
  • **Team touchpoint math:** 11 people × 3 posts/week × 300 min impressions = **40,000 monthly touchpoints** baseline
  • **Employee vs. brand page:** 8x more engagement, 6-8x more reach on personal posts

14-day launch playbook

### Days 1-3: Voice capture

  • Short interview with each team member (5-10 min) to extract their actual voice
  • Identify their domain expertise and 2-3 content pillars
  • Set realistic individual cadence (some commit to 1/week, some 3/week — don't force uniformity)
View full documentation

### Days 4-7: First posts

  • Everyone ships their first post, drafted in their voice
  • Marketing reviews only for brand safety (never for style)
  • Celebrate every first post internally — social proof unlocks the next team member

### Days 8-10: Ideation pipeline

  • Set up a shared ideation source (newsletter digest, trending-topics feed, internal wins)
  • Each team member gets 5-10 topic suggestions per week
  • They pick, not assigned

### Days 11-14: Rhythm lock

  • Establish cadence: each team member publishes on fixed days/times
  • Set up KPI dashboard (see below)
  • Run first weekly review

Governance: brand-safe without being blocked

**What marketing reviews:**

  • Factual claims about the company / products / customers
  • Confidential info
  • Legal/compliance issues (finance, health, regulated industries)

**What marketing does NOT review:**

  • Personal voice, tone, style
  • Opinions the team member has about their own work
  • Formatting, hashtags, emoji choices
  • Topic selection (within pillars)

**The review SLA:** <4 business hours. Anything longer and the post is dead (posts go stale in the news cycle).

ROI measurement

### Per-person metrics (content quality)

  • Impressions per post
  • Engagement rate (reactions + comments + shares / impressions)
  • Comments (depth signal)
  • Profile views attributed to post

### Team-level metrics (program health)

  • Total team reach
  • Total team engagement
  • Individual contribution rank (leaderboard)
  • Active members / total members (participation rate)

### Business metrics (pipeline impact)

  • Inbound DMs sourced from LinkedIn content
  • Meetings booked from LinkedIn
  • Closed-won deals with LinkedIn as first-touch channel
  • Employee referrals sourced from LinkedIn (if recruiting is a goal)

Anti-patterns

  • **Copy-paste corporate posts across team accounts** — LinkedIn detects this, suppresses all of them
  • **Ghostwriting that erases the writer's voice** — reads as fake
  • **Mandatory posting cadence without individual calibration** — program dies in 6 weeks
  • **Approval loops >24h** — makes the program feel like work
  • **Measuring only vanity metrics** — program gets cut without pipeline attribution
  • **All-same pillars across team** — redundancy kills team reach (360Brew penalizes clustering)

Resources

  • references/advocacy-principles.md — the 4 operating principles with examples
  • references/team-cadence-matrix.md — realistic cadence by role + seniority
  • references/governance-playbook.md — what to review, what not to, SLA

Related skills

  • linkedin-post-writer — each team member uses this for individual drafts
  • linkedin-profile-optimizer — team profiles should match before the program launches (otherwise profile clicks convert poorly)
  • linkedin-content-planner — each team member gets their own pillar mix
  • linkedin-thread-monitor — track which team members' comments drive author replies
  • linkedin-engager-analytics — see who's engaging with each team member's posts
  • linkedin-comment-drafter — its **reshare mode** is how team members amplify a brand or colleague post to their own feed with a short take (lib.repost(post_url, commentary) on approval); the cleanest advocacy action after an original post

Score breakdown

Trigger
8.5
Explicit trigger phrases and multi-scenario coverage; missing a When-Not boundary statement.
Structure
9.3
128-line SKILL.md with three focused references; clean separation and progressive disclosure.
Workflow
7.6
Structured playbook and governance tiers, but purely advisory: no execution modes, verification loop, or error paths.
Content
10.0
Specific numbers, tiered lists, sharp writing; commands not applicable.
Engineering
8.0
Correct frontmatter; references exist; no scripts to validate, bundle-relative links only.
Security
10.0
No scripts, no network, no credentials, no untrusted content handling.
Advisory program-management skill with no scripts or network. Solid 14-day launch playbook, tiered governance review model with SLA, realistic cadence benchmarks, ROI metric framework, and explicit anti-patterns. All local content; nothing security-relevant.

Assessment methodology

🧪
AI-assessed
Evaluated by automated analysis across quality, usability, and security dimensions. This is not a substitute for your own review — always inspect a skill before installing it.

Version history

v1.0.6b78503 2026-09-22
9 KB

— Refreshed from GitHub sergebulaev/linkedin-skills@6b78503

v1.0.0 2026-09-15
9 KB

Imported from sergebulaev/linkedin-skills@main