← Back to list
narrative-baseline-mapper ✓ Security reviewed
Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", o…
⚡ Productivity By aaron-he-zhu Version v1.0.0 Updated 2026-09-03
7.0Overall rating

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "narrative-baseline-mapper" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/narrative-baseline-mapper.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/narrative-baseline-mapper.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 4 KB

About this skill

Overview

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

Source

  • Repo: https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
  • Path: narrative/trace/narrative-baseline-mapper

Evaluation

AI-evaluated 2026-09-03: Well-defined surface-by-surface inventory with as-of dating, aligned/drifted/contradictory/silent gap reads, frozen drift baseline, robots pre-flight on scrapes, and untrusted-input handling. Slightly more standalone-friendly since it works from pasted copy, but still wired into the suite memory/registry conventions.

Score breakdown

Quality
8.0
Usability
6.0
Security
7.0
Popularity
7.0