← Back to list
⚡

retro Checked

Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized actio…
⚡ Productivity skills By phuryn Version v1.0.0 Added 2026-09-03 Updated 2026-09-03 Source ↗
8.0Overall rating
1Views
4Downloads
26.0kStars

Installation

🤖 Install via AI

Copy the prompt below and send it to your AI assistant (e.g. Claude Code) — it will follow the instructions and install automatically.

Install the "retro" skill by following the instructions at https://skill123.me/install/retro.
⌨️ Command line install

Run in your terminal — downloads and installs to ~/.claude/skills/.

curl -fsSL https://skill123.me/install/retro.sh | bash
📦 Download ZIP

Download the zip and extract it into your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/), then restart your session.

⬇ Download v1.0.0 · 1 KB
📊 Static rating
8.0/10
Trigger
7.0
Structure
8.0
Workflow
6.8
Content
9.0
Engineering
9.0
Security
9.5

Six-dimension rubric with reviewer rationale.

View scorecard ↓
🛡 Dynamic test
—

Not live-tested yet — this skill is rated on static analysis only.

About this skill

Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized action items with owners and deadlines. Use when running a retrospective, reflecting on a sprint, creating action items from team feedback, or learning how to run effective retros.

Documentation

Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized action items with owners and deadlines. Use when running a retrospective, reflecting on a sprint, creating action items from team feedback, or learning how to run effective retros.

Sprint Retrospective Facilitator

Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.

### Context

You are facilitating a retrospective for **$ARGUMENTS**.

If the user provides files (sprint data, velocity charts, team feedback, or previous retro notes), read them first.

### Instructions

1. **Choose a retro format** based on context (or let the user pick):

**Format A — Start / Stop / Continue**:

  • **Start**: What should we begin doing?
  • **Stop**: What should we stop doing?
  • **Continue**: What's working well that we should keep?

**Format B — 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For)**:

  • **Liked**: What did the team enjoy?
  • **Learned**: What new knowledge was gained?
  • **Lacked**: What was missing?
  • **Longed For**: What do we wish we had?

**Format C — Sailboat**:

  • **Wind (propels us)**: What's driving us forward?
  • **Anchor (holds us back)**: What's slowing us down?
  • **Rocks (risks)**: What dangers lie ahead?
  • **Island (goal)**: Where are we trying to get to?

2. **If the user provides raw feedback** (e.g., sticky notes, survey responses, Slack messages):

  • Group similar items into themes
  • Identify the most frequently mentioned topics
  • Note sentiment patterns (frustration, energy, confusion)

3. **Analyze the sprint performance**:

  • Sprint goal: achieved or not?
  • Velocity vs. commitment (over-committed? under-committed?)
  • Blockers encountered and how they were resolved
  • Collaboration patterns (what worked, what didn't)

4. **Generate prioritized action items**:

| Priority | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Success Metric |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1 | [Specific, actionable improvement] | [Name/Role] | [Date] | [How we'll know it worked] |

  • Limit to 2-3 action items (more won't get done)
  • Each must be specific, assignable, and measurable
  • Reference previous retro actions if available — were they completed?

5. **Create the retro summary**:


   ## Sprint [X] Retrospective — [Date]

   ### Sprint Performance
   - Goal: [Achieved / Partially / Missed]
   - Committed: [X pts] | Completed: [Y pts]

   ### Key Themes
   1. [Theme] — [summary]

   ### Action Items
   1. [Action] — [Owner] — [By date]

   ### Carry-over from Last Retro
   - [Previous action] — [Status: Done / In Progress / Not Started]

Save as markdown. Keep the tone constructive — the goal is improvement, not blame.

Score breakdown

Trigger
7.0
Description gives What and four When phrasings including learning intent; no When-Not and no Chinese keywords.
Structure
8.0
76-line single file; formats, table template, and summary template well placed; body starts at H2 not H1.
Workflow
6.8
Five steps with format choice, prioritized 2-3 action rule, success metrics column, and carry-over verification against last retro.
Content
9.0
Imperative, tight, constructive-tone rule; templates are directly usable.
Engineering
9.0
Valid frontmatter; no scripts; no external or internal references to break.
Security
9.5
No scripts, network, secrets, or injection; entirely benign facilitation content.
Solid retrospective facilitator with three selectable formats, themed feedback analysis, and a carry-over check on prior action items; no exclusions in trigger.